[CRUSH-build] Preparation for Las Vegas
Brian
WakeZero at aol.com
Tue Mar 14 19:30:36 MST 2006
Yes, I did rank them in order... but I think we can have one's cake and
eat it too!
Let's assume we spend the ten total hours available to us between now
and the competition to fabricate the parts needed to implement a
conveyor belt system. Those parts would be (1) the new roller, (2) the
top roller, and (3) the backplate. Let's also assume we spend that time
fabricating a track to prevent jamming in the basket.
Now to achieve the first goal of scoring in autonomous, we will most
definitely need to attend all of our practice matches in order to test
it. Assuming everything goes horribly wrong and we don't get it working
until the very last match, that will take up random time slots of 30
minutes (moving the robot to the field etc) between 10am and 5pm. Even
if we assumed that from 10 to 5 the robot was only available for
programming, that would give us 2 hours before and 3 hours after for
adding parts/fixing the robot. Since we know the main functions of the
robot already work, we can assume that most of that time can be spent
making upgrades.
Now for upgrades, Bill said we don't want to move the wheels (so unless
someone comes up with an idea to get on the ramp better, we can scratch
out goal 3). I would also advise against gearing us down because I think
the speed in our autonomous could prove useful. That leaves adding the
track to the basket and implementing the conveyor belt. The nice part
about both of these is that they can be done at the same time (assuming
enough hands can get near the robot) and don't have to be completed all
at once. Since we don't use our current collector anyway, I would see no
problem of attaching some of the parts, then going out for a practice
match, then coming back to add more etc.
It may be hectic, but I think all that can be done in the 12 hours
alloted to us on Thursday.
Brian
bill at wizardofaz.net wrote:
> If autonomous scoring is at or near the top of the list, then we for
> sure have to allocate significant time to developing and testing that
> fuction on the practice day. This precludes doing much else to the
> hardware that would use up that time. We can also do a careful
> assessment of why ramp climbing is so hard, and maybe do something
> about it if there's an easy idea. We have a lot of video, maybe
> viewing that will be helpful.
>
> Brian, if your rank 1 to 4 is correct, we shouldn't do anything to the
> collector system on Thursday until the last thing of the day, and I
> predict that will mean we don't do it at all. We can remake the
> collector roller here (I brought it home), and remount it quickly. I
> think it will be lighter - I'll use the ABS idea I saw on another
> robot instead of the aluminum - and a bigger shaft that can take a
> beating.
More information about the CRUSH-build
mailing list